Complex systems: The FLAW of large numbers


FAIL stamp

Image by hans.gerwitz via Flickr

 

Financial and Political elites appear intent to ignore lessons from nature and history…even though such short-sightedness may be amongst their final acts before the rigidity and complexity of the ecosystem they have created  proves to be their undoing.

Their unstinting commitment to such, patently, flawed belief systems – when the evidence is laid bare for others to see – WILL be their undoing. i has written so many blogs covering this that I feel I am repeating myself time and again but I am sure the links (below) will prove interesting for anyone kind enough to take an interest in my thoughts…or my interpretation of the thoughts of others.

Complexity: it’s complex, real, multi-layered and VERY dangerous

 

Regulators want big, complex banks to hold larger buffers of capital to protect the financial system. Big banks argue this is unnecessary because risk is diversified across their larger balance sheets. Who is right? Natural sciences – especially epidemiology, ecology and genetics – provide clues.

Are big banks less prone to failure? The traditional economics of diversification suggest so. By scaling up balance sheets across different classes of asset, risks to portfolios will tend, on average, to cancel each other out. Aggregate balance sheet risk is dampened the bigger the balance sheet. Big banks thus benefit from a law of large numbers.

Complex systems – those found in nature, but also in finance – tell a different tale. Here, scaling up risks may cause them to cascade rather than cancel out. The bigger and more complex the structure, the greater this risk.

Why? Because size and complexity increase the chances of cross-contamination of the whole barrel, even if there is only one bad apple. Errors do not cancel; they cascade. There is a flaw of large numbers.

via FT.com / Comment / Opinion – The birds and the bees, and the big banks.

2 Responses to Complex systems: The FLAW of large numbers

  1. David,
    true, but why call it the (f)law of large numbers? I quite doubt that the complex system of a bank will be described on a bell curve (and the law only applies in cases like that).
    CB

    • Christian,
      Thank you for taking the time to visit, comment and ask a perfectly reasonable question. It is the reason why there is a fundamental flaw at the heart of financial risk modelling…life isn’t Gaussian!

      Rather than admit “we don’t know what we don’t know” we invent something that is a palatable projection of what we do know, compounded by assumptions.

      David

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s