Domestic terrorists don’t wear pinstripes


Is it just me that is absolutely gobsmacked by this!?

Further evidence, of the lack of consistency and glaring inequalities. OK, we know that Regulators and Legislators see fit to ignore the scale of the crimes perpetrated by these banksters BUT for how much longer can any right-minded citizen stand idly by?

More (costly) regulation won’t change this culture but, CONSTRUCTIVE TRANSPARENCY can. And, in the process, reduce the risks associated with such behaviours.

Political and Financial leaders know that they are playing a very high stakes game and that there is a growing threat that ALL that they hold dear will, as a result of both their actions and inaction, come under threat. Would this go some way to explain the rate at which civil liberties are being stripped away across the Western world? I sincerely hope that such questions or suggestions don’t qualify me as a “domestic terrorist” because, as a mere citizen, anything could happen…

JPMorgan Chase has been sanctioned by US regulators for failures in its risk management operations after it lost more than $6.2 billion on a single credit derivatives trade. The sanctions follow the disclosure of significant losses in a large synthetic credit portfolio that was managed by the CIO. The botched bet – made by UK big fish Bruno Iksil – had managed to wipe out $51 billion in shareholder value before alarm bells started to ring at the bank’s head office in New York. Among other things, the Fed identified deficiencies in risk management oversight, modelling assumptions, audit and finance reporting and escalation to senior management. The OCC further found that the bank’s BSA (bank Secrecy Act) compliance programme had “critical deficiencies” with respect to suspicious activity reporting, monitoring transactions, conducting customer due diligence and risk assessment, and implementing adequate systems of internal controls and independent testing. Despite the criticism, JPMorgan Chase escaped with nothing more than a rap on the knuckles. No fines were levied by the watchdogs and the bank didn’t admit or deny wrongdoing in consenting to the regulatory orders

.

Fact or fabrication?:: Iran Attacks US Banks


The seal of the U.S. National Security Agency....

I am not anti-American nor am I given to looking for conspiracy theories BUT, wait a minute, what is that smell?

Can YOU smell it too? It smells like bullshit to me and “ticks so many boxes” that it looks like a lovingly crafted plot worthy of Hollywood. If you are a movie director or warmonger it wouldn’t work just quite so well if the alleged attacker were a non-Islamic country, particularly a powerful one like China, whose track record of cyber attacks on US isn’t great!

So here’s why I’m getting that whiff of BS.

The denial of service attacks now afflicting American banks are widely attributed to Iran. They’ve grown so serious that US banks have asked the National Security Agency for help.

via The Volokh Conspiracy » Iran Attacks US Banks; Privacy Groups Attack … NSA? Read more of this post

“Insolvent insurers not a systemic risk”– Insurance Insight


Link to report

Well that is reassuring…isn’t it!?

I have (quickly) read through the report and, whilst it is hard to argue that, based upon past experience, Insurers and Re-insurers ARE of “systemic importance”*, several key points appear to be overlooked…or, perhaps ASSUMED. Probably not the best starting point for such a, potentially significant, report!

Here are a few of the issues that struck me as worthy of comment, or questions:

  • impact of sovereign/banking default or collapse [cascading] on Capital liquidity
  • the inter-connections amongst individual (micro) and institutional investors (macro)
  • lack of transparency in relation to “counter party” relationships          [ins – ins – rein – fin. mkt. – ins – rein, etc.]
  • insurers obtain adequate information to understand, accurately assess and rate risks*, that are,
  • mostly idiosyncratic and uncorrelated”, and
  • “insured loss events are not normally correlated with financial crises or economic cycles” [risk – “known”]
  • reserve and reserving adequacy
  • customer/insurer, etc. implement effective risk management – dampens rather than amplifies risk
  • there is no need to differentiate or adapt risk strategy for uncertainty [unseen – “unknown”]
  • “complexity” is NOT a source of “unseen” risk that, unmanaged, adds to uncertainty
  • major sources of risk are exogenous
  • failure or collapse are gradual, manageable and “top down”
  • Reputational or Operational risks are not  major threats…

Read more of this post